Progar & Company, P.A.
Certified Public Accounting services for businesses and individuals
AMT relief in the 2008 Extenders Act (MS Word)
AMT relief in the 2008 Extenders Act (.pdf)
AMT relief in the 2008 Extenders Act
Dear Reader,
I am writing to provide details regarding three key provisions in
the “Tax Extenders, and Alternative Minimum Tax Relief Act of 2008”
(the 2008 Extenders Act), which was enacted on Oct. 3, 2008. The
provisions extend partial relief to individual taxpayers from the
alternative minimum tax, or AMT. Earlier temporary measures to deal
with the unintended creep of the AMT's reach expired at the end of
2007, meaning that more than 20 million additional taxpayers would
have faced paying the tax on their 2008 returns without the new
relief.
Brief overview of the AMT.
The AMT is a parallel tax system which does not permit several of
the deductions permissible under the regular tax system, such as
state, local and property taxes. Taxpayers who may be subject to the
AMT must calculate their tax liability under the regular federal tax
system and under the AMT system taking into account certain
“preferences” and “adjustments.” If their liability is found to be
greater under the AMT system, that's what they owe the federal
government. Originally enacted to make sure that wealthy Americans
did not escape paying taxes, the AMT has started to apply to more
middle-income taxpayers, due in part to the fact that the AMT
parameters are not indexed for inflation.
In recent years, Congress has provided a measure of relief from the
AMT by raising the AMT “exemption amounts”—allowances that reduce
the amount of alternative minimum taxable income (AMTI), reducing or
eliminating AMT liability. (However, these exemption amounts are
phased out for taxpayers whose AMTI exceeds specified amounts.) For
2007, the AMT exemption amounts were $66,250 for married couples
filing jointly and surviving spouses; $44,350 for single taxpayers;
and $33,125 for married filing separately. However, for 2008, those
amounts were scheduled to fall back to the amounts that applied in
2000: $45,000, $33,750, and $22,500, respectively. This would have
brought millions of additional middle-income Americans under the AMT
system, resulting in higher federal tax bills for many of them,
along with higher compliance costs associated with filling out and
filing the complicated AMT tax form.
New law provides one-year stopgap fix.
To prevent the unintended result of having millions of middle-income
taxpayers fall prey to the AMT, Congress has once again relied on a
temporary “patch” to the problem, this time a one-year extension of
the 2007 exemption amounts, increased slightly. Under the new law,
for tax years beginning in 2008, the AMT exemption amounts are
increased to: (1) $69,950 in the case of married individuals filing
a joint return and surviving spouses; (2) $46,200 in the case of
unmarried individuals other than surviving spouses; and (3) $34,975
in the case of married individuals filing a separate return.
Personal credits may be used to offset AMT through 2008.
Another provision in the new law provides AMT relief for taxpayers
claiming personal tax credits. The tax liability limitation rules
generally provide that certain nonrefundable personal credits
(including the dependent care credit, the elderly and disabled
credit, and the Hope Scholarship and Lifetime Learning credits) are
allowed only to the extent that a taxpayer has regular income tax
liability in excess of the tentative minimum tax, which has the
effect of disallowing these credits against AMT. Temporary
provisions had been enacted which permitted these credits to offset
the entire regular and AMT liability through the end of 2007. The
new law extends this temporary provision to tax years beginning in
2008.
Extension and modification of AMT credit allowance against incentive
stock options (ISOs).
A further provision in the new law liberalizes the AMT refundable
credit that was first enacted in 2006 to help taxpayers who were
stung by the AMT as a result of exercising incentive stock options
(ISOs). Under the regular tax, ISOs are not taxed upon exercise.
Under the AMT, however, a taxpayer generally must pay tax on the
stock value minus the price paid when the option is exercised. The
economic downturn in 2000 resulted in many individuals having to pay
tax on “phantom income” because the stock prices dropped
dramatically after the date of exercise. In 2006, Congress provided
relief for these situations by increasing the amount of the minimum
tax credit allowed to individuals generally and providing for a
partial refund, but this relief did not correct the ISO problem
entirely. The new law provides additional relief to affected
taxpayers by accelerating the refund attributable to AMT paid on the
phantom ISO income (and other AMTI amounts) and by stopping further
IRS efforts to collect unpaid amounts. Specifically, the new law
allows 50% of long-term unused minimum tax credits to reduce tax
over each of two years (instead of 20% over each of five years as
was allowed under pre-2008 Extenders Act law), eliminates a rule
that limited the relief available to higher-income taxpayers, and
abates any underpayment of tax (and applicable interest and
penalties) outstanding on Oct. 3, 2008 that is attributable to
pre-2008 phantom ISO income.
I hope this information is helpful. If you would like more details about these changes, or any other aspects of the new law, please do not hesitate to call.
Lewes CPA
office