Progar & Company, P.A.
Certified Public Accounting services for businesses and individuals
Suits against IRS over collection actions (MS Word)
Suits against IRS over collection actions (.pdf)
Suits against IRS over collection actions
Dear Reader:
You recently informed me that you may want to sue IRS over the
collection actions it has taken in your case.
It has always been difficult to sue IRS over unjustified collection
actions because of the doctrine of sovereign immunity. Under that
doctrine, a taxpayer may begin a suit against the U.S. only if the
U.S. has specifically waived sovereign immunity.
The main area in which sovereign immunity has been waived is where a
taxpayer alleges that an officer or employee of IRS recklessly,
intentionally, or by negligence disregarded any provision of the tax
law in connection with the collection of any federal tax. If IRS
employees take such unauthorized collection actions, the taxpayer
may sue the U.S. (but not the IRS Commissioner, an IRS agent, or any
other individual) in a federal district court. A taxpayer must
exhaust his administrative remedies within IRS before any judgment
for damages will be awarded. Further, any award may be reduced to
the extent that damages could reasonably have been mitigated by the
taxpayer.
Other suits that are sometimes brought over unfair collection
actions are:
-
a civil
action for damages against the U.S. in a district court where an
officer or employee of IRS knowingly, or through negligence,
fails to release a lien on the taxpayer's property. The taxpayer
must have exhausted his administrative remedies within IRS
before starting this type of action.
-
an action
against federal employees in their individual capacity for
violation of an individual's constitutional rights (often
referred to as a “Bivens action”). Many courts, however,
severely limit the ability of taxpayers to bring Bivens
actions against IRS agents.
-
an injunction
action (an order directing IRS to refrain from collecting the
tax). These actions must meet narrow statutory criteria, or it
must be clear that IRS won't prevail on its tax claim.
-
a suit to
quiet title to property on which the U.S. has a lien. Quiet
title actions can be used to challenge procedural irregularities
in the assessment process, but not to attack the validity of an
underlying tax assessment.
It is also possible to get a judicial determination relating to a
lien or a levy by appealing IRS determinations in Collection Due
Process (CDP) hearings to the Tax Court, but CDP procedures are only
available if the taxpayer requests a CDP hearing within a 30-day
period. This 30-day period is calculated, in the case of levies,
from the day after the taxpayer receives notice of his right to a
hearing, and, in the case of liens, from the day after the end of
the five-day period within which IRS must provide notice to the
taxpayer of the filing of a notice of federal tax lien. These time
limits cannot be waived, however, a written request submitted within
the 30-day period that does not satisfy content requirements is
considered timely if the request is perfected within a reasonable
period of time. If the request for a CDP hearing is untimely, either
because the request was not submitted within the 30-day period or
not perfected within the reasonable period provided, the taxpayer
will be notified of the untimeliness of the request and offered an
“equivalent hearing.” But no judicial review of an equivalent
hearing determination is available.
Lewes CPA
office